THE PRINCIPLES OF FORMING THE ARCHITECTURE OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK SATIRICAL PROSE

Murodova Mukadas(1)
(1) Kattakurgan Branch of Samarkand State University

Abstract

To explain the etymology of the term "satirical mode" in world literature and its meaning used in modern literary studies, to reveal the concepts of hero and anti-hero in satirical works, to show the complex nature of the relationship between individuals and society, to determine the principles that form the architecture of English and Uzbek satirical prose, tasks such as researching important aspects of its poetics are gaining importance today. Therefore, the scholars of the field pay serious attention to highlighting the problems and tasks related to a type of artistic creation - satire and humor. Satirical works ruthlessly expose a certain era, social life, vices in society and between people through laughter, and show that they should be abandoned. In world literature, satire is recognized as a unique principle of artistic expression of reality, a type of comedy and a mode of art used in all types of literature - lyrical, epic and dramatic works which can be stated as the topicality of the article. The tasks of the research are to base the genesis and stages of formation of satire, to show its genetic connection with genres such as pamphlet, parody, feuilleton, epigram, parable, caricature, anecdote and its unique poetic features; It is to explain the essence of the term "satirical mode" in modern literary studies, to reveal the socio-life factors that create satire, the principles of expression in different genres, and its content in a historical-comparative aspect. Comparative-typological, biographical, and contextual analysis methods were used in the research process. The purpose of the article is to study the architecture of English and Uzbek satirical prose and to determine its principles.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Abrams M.H., A Glossary of Literary Terms, Boston: Cornell University Press, 1999, 275 p.

Bakhtin M.M., Romanda zamon va khronotop shakllari (Time and chronotope forms in the nove), Toshkent, 2015, 115 p.

Bakhtin M.M., Sobranie sochinenii (Collected Works), Moscow: Russkie slovari, 1997, 369 p, available at: https://djvu.online/file/b6z4Uj9wn9MDm

Belinskii V.G., Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. T.5. (The Complete Works. Vol.5.), Moscow, 1954, 156 p.

Chris B., The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 236 p.

Coyle M., Encyclopedia of Literature and Criticism-Routledge, Wales: 1993, 211 p.

Cuddon J.A., Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory, London: Penguin books, 1999, 780 p.

Gilenson B.A., Antichnaya literatura. Drevnii Rim. Kniga 2 (Ancient literature. Ancient Rome. Book 2.), Moskva: Flinta, Nauka, 2001, available at: http://antique-lit.niv.ru/antique-lit/gilenson-drevnijrim/index.html

Gorkiy M., Adabiyot haqida (About Literature), Tashkent: Davlat badiiy adabiyot nashriyoti, 1962, 145 p.

Hastings S., Waugh E. A biography. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, New York. 1994, 195 p.

Johnson E., The Nature and Value of Satire, New York, 1945, 365 p.

Kahhor A., Asarlar. Besh jildlik. 3-jild, (Works. Five volumes. Volume 3,) Tashkent, 1988, 198 p.

Kahhor A., Adabiyotimiz avtobiografiyasi (Autobiography of our literature), Toshkent: Gafur Gulom nomidagi adabiyot va san’at nashriyoti, 1973, 214 p.

Kahhor A., Muhabbat (The love), Tashkent, Yangi asr avlodi, 2014, 226 b.

Kahhor A., Yoshlar bilan suhbat (Conversation with young people), Tashkent: Yosh gvardiya, 1968, 141 p.

Kodiriy A., Ijod mashaqqati (The pain of creativity), Tashkent: Uqituvchi, 1995, 228 p.

Kuronov D., Mamajonov Z., Sheraliyeva M. Adabiyotshunoslik lugati (Dictionary of literary studies), Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2013, 141 p.

Mify narodov mira: Entsikl. v 2 T. (Myths of the peoples of the world: An Encyclopedia in 2 volumes), Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1988, pp. 415–416.

Park C., Carnivalism and Engaging Journalism in the Current-Affairs Podcasts in South Korea. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 2016, No 4, pp. 75–88, available at: www.scopus.com

. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2016.43008

.

Rimskaya satira (Roman Satire), Moscow: Khudozh. lit., 1989, 549 p, available at: https://djvu.online/file/rjL50IdE9hJbX

Tyupa V.I., Analitika khudozhestvennogo: vvedenie v literaturovedcheskii analiz (Art analysis: an introduction to literary analysis), Moscow: Labirint: Izdatel'stvo RGGU, 2001, pp. 185–187.

Urayeva D., Quvvatova D. Jahon adabiyoti atamalarining izohli lugati (Explanatory Dictionary of World Literature Terms), Tashkent: Turon zamin ziyo, 2015, 87 p.

Waugh E., A Little Order, London, 1977, 233 p.

Waugh E., The Complete stories of Evelyn Waugh. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, New York, London, 1999, 611 p.

Zhalilova L., 10 asr boshidagi Amerika satirik novellasining poetikasi; Filol.fan. fals. d-ri (PhD) disser. avtoref. (Poetics of the American satirical novel at the beginning of the 20th century Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis), Bukhoro, 2021, 11 p.

Authors

Murodova Mukadas
info@fledu.uz (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Murodova Mukadas

Doctor of Philosophy in Philological Sciences (PhD)

THE PRINCIPLES OF FORMING THE ARCHITECTURE OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK SATIRICAL PROSE. (2024). Foreign Languages ​​in Uzbekistan (JOURNALFLEDU.COM), 59(6), 270-286. https://doi.org/10.36078/1735885290

Article Details

How to Cite

THE PRINCIPLES OF FORMING THE ARCHITECTURE OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK SATIRICAL PROSE. (2024). Foreign Languages ​​in Uzbekistan (JOURNALFLEDU.COM), 59(6), 270-286. https://doi.org/10.36078/1735885290