ENHANCING STUDENTS’ ECOLINGUISTIC AWARENESS AS A KEY EDUCATIONAL PRIORITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY
Abstract
This article discusses the improvement of students' ecolinguistic awareness as one of the important tasks in education in the 21st century. Today, climate change, environmental problems and the role of language in these problems are increasing, therefore, improving students' ecolinguistic knowledge is becoming more and more relevant. The need to educate an environmentally conscious and sustainable development-oriented generation is the main task facing the education system. The existing environmental problems in Uzbekistan (Aral Sea tragedy, water shortage, land degradation, etc.) are reflected in ecology and environmental sciences, but it is a matter of concern that they are not sufficiently covered in the language education process and that students do not sufficiently understand the linguistic aspects of environmental problems. At the same time, the article proposes introducing an ecolinguistic approach to foreign language lessons, integrating the principles of "green" pedagogy into educational programs, and involving students in global issues such as environmental justice and the climate crisis through a critical approach. Developing students’ environmental awareness through language teaching enhances their critical thinking, civic responsibility, global awareness, and environmental literacy. In particular, this process can be effectively implemented through pedagogical methods consistent with the CEFR system and the Sustainable Development Goals. In conclusion, it can be said that the integration of ecolinguistics and “green” pedagogy into foreign language lessons is an innovative approach based on understanding the connection between environmental sustainability, language, and culture, and is an important tool in preparing students for building a sustainable and just future.
Full text article
References
Alexander, R. J. (2017). Ecolinguistics and English language education: Perspectives on environmental discourse in media and literature. Journal of Environmental Education, 48(2), 120–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1269645
Bang, J. C. (1993). Ecolinguistics: A framework. Retrieved from http://www.jcbang.dk/main/ecolinguistics/Ecoling_AFramework1993.pdf
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Conde, M. D. C., & Sanchez, J. S. (2010). The school curriculum and environmental audit experience. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(4), 477–494.
Drašković, D. (2024). Nurturing green skills: Serbia’s progress in the global green economy. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/acceleratorlabs/undp-serbiaaccelerator-lab
Fill, A. F., & Penz, H. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. Routledge.
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kind, H. (2023). How to incorporate climate justice in the language classroom. Retrieved from https://green-action-elt.uk/climate-justice-inthe-language-classroom/
Kramsch, C. (2014). Language and culture. AILA Review, 27, 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.27.02kra
Marshall, G. (2015). Don’t even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. New York: Bloomsbury USA.
Mete, D. E. (2018). Incorporating environmental education English language through Bloom’s revised taxonomy, (40), 33–44.
Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2018). Teachers and human rights education. Trentham Books.
Permanent Mission of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the United Nations. (2017, May 16). Problems of the Aral Sea and water resources of Central Asia. United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.int/uzbekistan/news/problems-aral-sea-and-waterresources-central-asia
Pylaeva, E. M. (2011). Ekolingvistika kak novoe napravlenie v yazykoznanii XXI veka. Vestnik PNIPU. Problemy yazykoznaniya i pedagogiki, (5). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekolingvistika-kak-novoe-napravlenie-vyazykoznanii-hhi-veka
(In Rus.)
Riegerova, M. J. (2011). Environmental education in English lessons [Bachelor thesis]. Masaryk University. https://is.muni.cz/th/eesms/Bachelor_thesis_-_Jana_Riegerova_np2lw.pdf
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Harmon, D. (2018). Biological diversity and language diversity: Parallels and differences. In A. F. Fill & H. Penz (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics (pp. 11–25). Routledge.
Sobirova, G. S., & Yuldasheva, M. B. (2018). The main ecological problems in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Molodoi uchenyi, (2)188, 171–173. Retrieved from https://moluch.ru/archive/188/47755/
(In Rus.)
Steffensen, S. (2024). On the demarcation of ecolinguistics. Journal of World Languages, 10(3), 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2024-0043
Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge.
The International Ecolinguistics Association. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ecolinguistics-association.org/
Toth, S. (n.d.). Top 10 benefits of environmental education. Project Learning Tree. Retrieved from https://www.plt.org/educator-tips/top-tenbenefits-environmental-education/
Uma, P. (2024). Integrating resilience considerations into English language teaching in the context of climate change. Shanlax International Journal of English, 12(S1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v12iS1-Feb.7404
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
United Nations Development Programme. (n.d.). Environment and climate action. UNDP Uzbekistan. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/uzbekistan/environment-and-climateaction
Usama, M., & Tarai, S. (2024). Eco-linguistic approach in English language education: Enhancing English language proficiency and sustainability awareness. Language in India, 24(7). Retrieved from http://www.languageinindia.com
Vaselinovska, S. S., & Kivora, S. (2013). Blending the teaching of environmental matters and English as a second or foreign language in Macedonia. Natura Montenegrina, 12(3–4), 1065–1071.
Yıldırım, M., & Aytan, T. (2025). Greening language learning pathways: Three sustainable practices using the STAR framework. Sustainability, 17(5), 2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052046
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).