THE CONCEPTUAL USE OF ANIMAL METAPHORS IN THE REPRESENTATION OF HUMANS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK PROVERBS
Abstract
Proverbs hold significant cultural value as succinct expressions of collective wisdom, reflecting the attitudes, beliefs, and values of a society. Embedded within these short, memorable sayings are insights into cultural norms, social hierarchies, and the human condition. Proverbs serve as a window into the cultural psyche, offering glimpses into societal perceptions of morality, gender roles, and interpersonal relationships. Animal metaphors are a common feature of proverbs across cultures, serving as powerful symbolic representations of human qualities, behaviors, and characteristics. Animals embody a rich array of cultural meanings and associations, making them potent vehicles for conveying complex ideas and cultural values. In proverbs, animal metaphors are employed to illustrate virtues, vices, and universal truths about human nature, providing vivid imagery that resonates with audiences. The purpose of this article is to undertake a comparative analysis of the conceptual use of animal metaphors in English and Uzbek proverbs to represent humans. By examining the underlying conceptual frameworks and cognitive associations embedded within these metaphors, this study aims to elucidate how animal imagery is employed to convey cultural perceptions of human behavior, identity, and social dynamics. Through this analysis, we seek to deepen our understanding of the cultural significance of animal metaphors in proverbs and their role in shaping cultural attitudes and beliefs about humanity.
Full text article
References
Baider, F., & Gesuato, S. (2003). Masculinist metaphors, feminist research. The Online Journal Metaphorik.de, 5, 6–25.
Emanatian, M. (1995). Metaphor and the expression of emotion: The value of cross-cultural perspectives. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 163–182.
Emanatian, M. (1996). Everyday metaphors of lust and sex in Chagga. Ethos, 24(2), 195–236.
Fu, J. (2008). The conceptual motivation of animal proverbs in English and Chinese. Kristianstad University College.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and body in human feeling. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
López, I. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación / Culture, Language and Representation, 7, 77–100.
López Maestre, M. D. (2001). War in the news: Fight in cognitive stylistics research. RESLA, 14, 27–243.
López Maestre, M. D. (2009). Immigration and conceptual metaphors: A critical approach to ideological representation. In R. G. Morón, M. P. Cruz, L. F. Amaya, & M. O. H. López (Eds.), Intercultural, cognitive and social pragmatics (pp. 60–87). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
López Maestre, M. D., & Ramón Sales, E. (2005). Love is hunting: An exploration into the use of conceptual metaphors in English poetry. In J. L. Otal et al. (Eds.), Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 87–97). Castelló de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sabariah, M. R., Pabiyah, H., & Nurul, N. M. (2012). Farm animal metaphors in Malay and Arabic figurative expressions: Implications for language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(7), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.33
Silaški, N., & Đurović, T. (2010). Catching inflation by the tail: Animal metaphoric imagery in the conceptualisation of inflation in English. Ibérica, 20, 57–80.
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).