WHAT DO CLASSIFIERS CLASSIFY? MORPHOSYNTAX OF GENDER AND CLASSIFIERS IN JAPANESE
Abstract
This paper is part of the research project that examines the functions and distributions of classifiers in Japanese and other classifier languages, comparing them to other noun classification systems and with other number and counting systems. This paper specifically seek to investigate whether classifiers in Japanese are instances of Noun Classes (found in, e.g., Bantu languages), grammatical gender (found in, e.g., French, German, Russian), or animacy gender. Close scrutiny of the past relevant literature is conducted to elucidate these structures, and to investigate their similarities and differences of these constructions. Linguistic data is also obtained from the judgments of native speakers. It is demonstrated that classifiers in Japanese do not pattern with Noun Classes or grammatical gender, in terms of their interactions with nouns and the flexibility. The introduction of constructions involving animacy gender, such as interrogatives and existential constructions, demonstrates that classifiers do not probe animacy gender of nouns. This paper presents some understudied applications of classifiers in Japanese, and offers a comparative study of the aforementioned constructions, which, in my shallow knowledge, have escaped attention in the past relevant literature. The work primarily examines classifiers in Japanese; nonetheless, it offers significant implications for other classifier languages as well as non-classifier languages with respect to number, counting properties, and the mass-count distinction.
Full text article
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Mihas, E. I. (Eds.). (2019). Genders and classifiers: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842019.001.0001
Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language, 53(2), 285–311.
Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2009). The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26(3), 217–252.
Borer, H. (2005). In name only. Oxford University Press.
Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192
Chierchia, G. (1998a). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 53–103). Kluwer.
Chierchia, G. (1998b). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339–405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.
Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, G. G. (2013). Number of genders. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), WALS Online (v2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591
Dixon, R. M. W. (1986). Noun classes and noun classification in typological perspectives. In C. Colette (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 105–112). John Benjamins.
Downing, P. (1996). Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Greenberg, J. (1972). Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers in Language Universals, 9, 2–39.
Inagaki, S., & Barner, D. (2009). Countability in absence of count syntax: Evidence from Japanese quantity judgments. In S. Inagaki et al. (Eds.), Studies in language sciences 8 (pp. 111–126). Kuroshio Publisher.
Li, X. (2013). Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax-semantics interface. De Gruyter.
Lochbihler, B., Oxford, W., & Welch, N. (2021). The person-animacy connection: Evidence from Algonquian and Dene. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 66(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2021.14
Matthewson, L. (2004). On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70(4), 369–415.
Mizuguchi, S. (2004a). Individuation in numeral classifier languages: A case of Japanese classifiers and plurals. Shohakusha.
Mizuguchi, S. (2004b). Ruibetsushi towa nanika [What are classifiers?]. In Y. Nishimitsu & S. Mizuguchi (Eds.), Ruibetsushi no taishoo (pp. 3–22). Kuroshio Publisher.
Nomoto, H. (2013). Number in classifier languages (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota.
Rothstein, S. (2010). Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 27(3), 343–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq007
Shimojo, M. (1997). The role of the general category in the maintenance of numeral-classifier systems: The case of tsu and ko in Japanese. Linguistics, 35(4), 705–733. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.705
Sutton, P. R., & Filip, H. (2016). Counting in context: Count/mass variation and restrictions on coercion in collective artifact nouns. In Proceedings of SALT 26 (pp. 350–370).
Watanabe, A. (2006). Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24(1), 241–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-3042-4
Watanabe, A. (2008). The structure of DP. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 513–540). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.001.0001
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).