ON THE PRINCIPLES OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF SYNTACTICAL HOMONYMS

Abstract

It is well known that the phenomenon of homonyms and homonymy in a language has been studied only as an object of the lexical-morphological level of the language. However, in recent years, in linguistics, special attention has been paid to studying the structures based on two-way syntactic communication, that is, words and phrases simultaneously having several dominants. This situation is due to the fact that the scope of studying the phenomenon of homonymy has expanded. Hence, it should be analyzed as a multifaceted linguistic phenomenon observed at all levels of the language. In speech communication, a person, without realizing it, constantly creates various multi-valued constructions, uses them in his speech and at the same time analyzes them in his thinking. Naturally, the syntactic ambiguities used by the speaker when expressing oral and written speech, suggesting a pragmatic content (presupposition), cause many difficulties for the recipient. Such a non-standard form of syntactic connection arises because of its inseparable connection with structural-syntactic homonymy. Under the concept of structural homonymy, we mean a speech chain that has several propositions. At present, the identification of syntactic ambiguity is considered one of the fundamental problems of modern theoretical and applied linguistics. The following study pays special attention to the study of syntactic homonyms, their definition and classification. It also recommends the principles of analysis, which, to a certain extent, are criteria for the classification of synonyms; and the classification of syntactic homonyms is substantiated through the analysis of examples in the process of interpreting speech.