THE ORIGIN AND ESSENCE OF THE SIGN: COMMUNICATION THROUGH SIGNS IN THE PREHISTORIC AND AGRARIAN ERAS

Fayzulla Abdullayevich Muminov(1)
(1) Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Abstract

The article examines the sign as one of the fundamental forms of understanding and transmitting information in the history of human communication. Drawing on semiotic, philosophical, and cultural-historical approaches, it analyzes the evolution of sign forms from archaic ways of orientation in the world to more complex systems of social communication. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between the sign, the symbol, object-based and abstract thinking, and to the role of sign systems in the prehistoric and agrarian eras. The author’s hypothesis is that the development of civilization may be described as a gradual complication and acceleration of the ways in which meanings are encoded, stored, and transmitted. In this context, the contemporary stage of communication makes it possible to raise the question of the further increase in the role of compact, visually rich, and rapidly combinable sign units. The article is the first part of a series devoted to the historical dynamics of sign communication and the prospects for its development.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Bell, D. (1999). Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya [The coming post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting]. Academia.

Benveniste, É. (1974). Obshchaya lingvistika [General linguistics]. Progress.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti [The social construction of reality]. Medium.

Cassirer, E. (2002). Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form [The philosophy of symbolic forms]. Universitetskaya kniga.

Castells, M. (2000). Informatsionnaya epokha: Ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura [The information age: Economy, society and culture]. GU VShE.

Chomsky, N., & Berwick, R. (2019). Chelovek govoryashchiy: Evolyutsiya i yazyk [Why only us: Language and evolution]. Piter.

Eco, U. (1998). Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura: Vvedenie v semiologiyu [A theory of semiotics]. Petropolis.

Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Kul'tura i vzryv [Culture and explosion]. Gnozis.

Morris, C. (1983). Osnovaniya teorii znakov [Foundations of the theory of signs]. In Yu. S. Stepanov (Ed.), Semiotika [Semiotics] (pp. 37–89). Raduga.

Obshchee yazykoznanie [General linguistics]. (1983). A. E. Suprun (Ed.). Vysshaya shkola.

Peirce, C. S. (2000). Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya [Selected philosophical works]. Logos.

Saussure, F. de. (1977). Trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Works on linguistics]. Progress.

Toffler, A. (2010). Tret'ya volna [The third wave]. AST.

Trubetzkoy, N. S. (2000). Osnovy fonologii [Principles of phonology]. Aspekt Press.

Webster, F. (2004). Teorii informatsionnogo obshchestva [Theories of the information society]. Aspekt Press.

Authors

Fayzulla Abdullayevich Muminov
shaxnozaxalsaidova@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Fayzulla Abdullayevich Muminov

Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor
Faculty of International Journalism

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0513-0209

Muminov, F. (2026). THE ORIGIN AND ESSENCE OF THE SIGN: COMMUNICATION THROUGH SIGNS IN THE PREHISTORIC AND AGRARIAN ERAS. Foreign Languages ​​in Uzbekistan (JOURNALFLEDU.COM), 68(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.36078/1783401836

Article Details

How to Cite

Muminov, F. (2026). THE ORIGIN AND ESSENCE OF THE SIGN: COMMUNICATION THROUGH SIGNS IN THE PREHISTORIC AND AGRARIAN ERAS. Foreign Languages ​​in Uzbekistan (JOURNALFLEDU.COM), 68(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.36078/1783401836

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.