THE RATIO OF VERBAL AND NON-VERBAL MEANS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK DRAMAS
Abstract
Various aspects of modern linguistics differ in the object of study and methodological issues.. Since the late 20th century, the dominance of views on the anthropocentric paradigm has paved the way for the emergence of several interdisciplinary fields, including linguo-pragmatics. Studies in world linguistics are being conducted to explore the possibilities of two languages, analyzing the intellectual expression that arises in the process of translation from one language to another, its formal structure, the possibilities of internal speech, and specific structural features. . The discursive process, the role of verbal and non-verbal components in the speech situation, the linguistic consciousness of the addressee and the speaker, indicators of intercultural relations, evaluation, and interpretation issues, serve to illuminate the possibilities of linguistic units in speech. The study of the relationship between verbal and non-verbal components in dramatic discourse, using Uzbek and English languages as examples, is one of the current topics in linguistics. The article discusses the relationship of verbal and non-verbal means used in English and Uzbek dramas. It presents the discourse, linguo-cultural, and sociolinguistic analysis of these means.
Full text article
References
1. Alain Mignault and Avi Chaudhuri. The Many Faces of a Neutral
Face: Head Tilt and Perception of Dominance and Emotion, .Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27 (2), Summer 2003, Human Sciences Press, Inc.
available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1023914509763
2. Argyle M. Bodily Communication, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Methuen. 1988, 363 p.
3. Boshbekov Sh. Temir khotin. Komediya (Iron wife. Comedy), www.ziyonet.uz 4. Centorrino, S., Djemai, E., Hopfensitz, A., Milinski, M., & Seabright, P. Honest signaling in trust interactions: Smiles rated as genuine induce trust and signal higher learning opportunities, Evolution and Human Behavior, 2015, No. 36 (1), 8–16, available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381000026
5. Davletnazarova L.B. Some Reviews on Mathematic Linguistics, 2022, No 1, pp. 226–231, available at: http://compling.navoiyuni.uz/index.php/conferences/ article/view/84
6. Davletnazarova L. B. Characteristics of Compound Sentences and Ways to Teach Them, Pedagogicheskie nauki: Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2021, No. 1, pp. 73-75.
7. Depica Phutela. The Importance of Non-Verbal Communication. Phutela, Deepika, IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 2015, No. 4, pp. 43-49.
8. Dibble J. L., & Rosaen, S. F. Parasocial interaction as more than friendship: Evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures, Journal of Media Psychology, 2011, No. 23 (3), pp. 122–132, available at: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000044
9. Khursanov N. I. Types of Semantic Transference in Dramatic Discourse (on the Example of Uzbek and English Texts), Academicia: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2022, Vol.12, No.4., pp. 152–158, available at: https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:aca&volume=12&iss ue=4&article=b025
10. Khursanov N. I. The Ratio of Verbal and Non-verbal Components in Dramatic Discourse (on the Example of Works in Uzbek and English), Abstract of Dissertation for PhD, Andijan, Andijan State University, 2022, 26 p.
11. Khursanov N. Discourse and pragmatics: phenomena in linguistics. Uzbekistan: Language and Culture. 2023 Oct 4; 1(1).
12. Khursanov N.I. International Journal of Word Art, 2023, No.6 (1), pp. 33-41, available at: https://zenodo.org/records/7680567
13. Khursanov NI. Linguopragmatic Characteristics of Stylistic Units Used in Uzbek and English Dramas. UzA-National Information Agency of Uzbekistan, 2022, No 4(4), 2022.
14. Knapp M. L. Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972, 213 p.
15. Michael Argyle. The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour, U.S.A.: Penguin Group. 1994, available at: https://www.amazon.com/PsychologyInterpersonal-Behaviour-Penguin-November/dp/B00ENKMHG8
16. Niyozova G. & Raupova, The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 2021, No.3 (02), pp. 210–215.
17. Nurmonov A. Tanlangan asarlar, 3 jildli (Selected works. 3 volumes), Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2012, 263 p.
18. Osborne J. Look Back in anger, London: Faber and Faber, 1996, 103 p.
19. Pinter H., & Cohen, H. The homecoming, Karnac: Curwen, 1968, available at: https://www.tooveys.com/lots/418204/pinter-harold-haroldcohen-illustrator-the-homecoming-london-h
20. Raupova L., Khursanov N., Khursanova L., Polatova S. Development of world modern linguistics and discourse interpretation in it, In E3S Web of Conferences 2023, available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341303023
21. Richmond V. P., McCroskey J. C., & Payne, S. K. Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1987. Available at: https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:000240361
22. Saidxonov M. Noverbal vositalar va ularning uzbek tilida ifodalanishi (Nonverbal means and their expression in uzbek), candidate’s thesis, Tashkent, 1993,161 p.
23. Шарипова, С., & Раупова, Л. Проблема литературного языка в первой половине написанных источников XIX века. Общество и инновации, 2(4/S). 2021. С. 890-898. – Sharipova S., & Raupova L. Obshchestvo i innovatsii, 2021, No.2 (4/ S), pp. 890–898.
24. Zellig S. Harris. The structure of science information. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Volume 35, Issue 4, August 2002, pp. 215-221, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00011-X
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).