COGNITIVE SPACE OF THE TRANSLATOR WHEN WORKING WITH HUMOROUS TEXTS
Abstract
This article examines some problems encountered in translation activities when working with literary texts, particularly when working with literary works containing humorous texts. The issue of the practical application of knowledge obtained with the help of modern cognitive science is considered. Based on the data of cognitive linguistics, observations of the translator's thinking (consciousness) are presented, and at the same time, information important in the coding process in translation is presented in the form of a diagram. Also, the interpreter's cognitive space of available information in the decision-making process was determined. We have developed our research on the expression of the feeling of humor in the translation of humorous texts, relying on the semantic theory of humor by V. Raskin and the theory developed later as the general theory of oral humor by S. Attardo. In the process of expressing the feeling of humor, the translator complements the elements that form the scripts. This method of schematic description allows one to understand the translator's thought, determine the structure of the script, and analyze the degree to which the sense of humor is manifested in the translated text.
Full text article
References
Abaeva, E. S. (2017). Edinitsa perevoda pri rabote s yumoristicheskim effektom. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University, No. 6, pp. 5–11.
Attardo, S. (2011). Humorous texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brone, G. (2017). Cognitive Linguistics and Humor Research. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, pp. 250–266.
Chiaro, D. (2017). Humor and Translation. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, pp. 414–429.
Davies, C. (2011). Jokes and Targets. Indiana University Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262088759_Jokes_and_Targets_by_Christie_J_H_Davies
G‘afurov, I. (2012). Tarjima nazariyasi. Tafakkur Bo‘stoni. Tashkent.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1972). Reading in Modern Linguistics. In Malmberg (Ed.), pp. 13–24.
Ioffe, V. V. (1973). Proiskhozhdenie i razvitie roda v praindoevropeiskom yazyke (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis). Rostov-on-Don.
Karimshoev, D. (1973). Kategoriya roda v pamirskikh yazykakh … (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis). Moscow.
Koshelev, A. D. (2019). O genezise myshleniya i yazyka… Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury.
Kubryakova, E. S., Dem'yankov, V. Z., Pankrats, Yu. G., & Luzina, L. G. (1997). Kratkii slovar' kognitivnykh terminov. Moscow: Lomonosov MSU.
Musiichuk, M. V. (2012). Kognitivnye mekhanizmy struktury komicheskogo (Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis). Novosibirsk.
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humour. Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/semanticmechanis0000rask
Safarov, Sh. (2020). Kognitiv tilshunoslik nazariyasi. Jizzax: Sangzor nashriyoti.
Safarov, Sh. (2020). Kognitiv tilshunoslik nazariyasi. Jizzax: Sangzor nashriyoti.
(Duplicate entry retained.)
Shakhobiddinova, Sh. (2001). Umumiylik va xususiylik dialektikasi… (Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis). Toshkent.
Shakhobiddinova, Sh. (2001). Umumiylik va xususiylik dialektikasi hamda uning o‘zbek tili morfologiyasida aks etishi (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis). Tashkent.
Valeeva, N. G. (2018). Teoriya perevoda: kul'turno-kognitivnyi i kommunikativno-funktsional'nyi aspekty. Moscow: Peoples' Friendship University of Russia.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics (Pragmatics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(Duplicate entry retained.)
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).