POLITENESS AS A SOCIO-CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC PHENOMENON
Abstract
Politeness is regarded as a universal social norm, interpreted differently across various cultural contexts. It plays a vital role in facilitating effective communication among members of society. Since each culture employs distinct politeness strategies, examining the features of linguistic politeness has become increasingly important in today’s rapidly changing world. This study aims to analyze how society and culture influence the formation of linguistic politeness in the context of digital communication. As each language reflects its unique cultural and social background — including English and Uzbek — this topic stands out as one of the most intriguing in contemporary linguistics. The primary research objective is to explore these relationships using a range of traditional and modern analytical methods, to interpret the interplay between society and social settings, and to trace the evolution of linguistic politeness, especially from a sociolinguistic perspective. The research employs a sociolinguistic approach to the analysis of politeness strategies. This methodology has opened new avenues for studying politeness within fragmented, context-specific discourses in modern linguistics. The findings show that politeness develops differently among individuals, depending on sociolinguistic factors such as social status, power dynamics, age, gender, and cultural background. In conclusion, the study highlights the significance of culture, age, gender, social status, and power in the discourse of politeness. These factors were analyzed through various traditional and modern approaches based on materials from social media communication in unrelated languages such as English and Uzbek.
Full text article
References
Adamboyeva, N. Q. (2024). Ingliz va uzbek tillarida khushmuomalalik kategoriyasining aksiolingvistik hususiyatlari [Axiolinguistic features of the category of politeness in English and Uzbek] (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Fergana.
al-Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–310). Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Florence, H. (1872). Ladies’ book of etiquette and manual of politeness. G. W. Cottrell.
Formanovskaya, N. I. (n.d.). Rechevoi etiket i vezhlivost’ [Speech etiquette and politeness]. Retrieved from http://literary.ru/literary/ru/readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1205319091&archive=12053242
Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 219–236.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Pantheon Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788387
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 41–58). University of Chicago.
Kholova, M. B. (2023). Ingliz va uzbek badiiy asarlarida khushmuomalalik kategoriyasining lingvomadaniy va sotsiopragmatik hususiyatlari [Linguistic and sociopragmatic features of the category of politeness in English and Uzbek fiction]. Bukhara.
Kodirova, M. (2022). Tilshunoslikda murojaat birliklari masalasi (ingliz va uzbek tillari tahlili asosida) [The question of reference units in linguistics (based on English and Uzbek analysis)]. Termiz.
Kulikova, L. V. (2006). Kommunikativnyi stil’ v mezhkul’turnoi paradigme [Communicative style in the intercultural paradigm]. Krasnoyarsk.
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness: Or minding your p’s and q’s. In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 292–305). University of Chicago.
Larina, T. V. (2003). Kategoriya vezhlivosti v angliiskoi i russkoi kommunikativnykh kul’turakh [The category of politeness in English and Russian communicative cultures]. Moscow.
Larina, T. V. (2009). Kategoriya vezhlivosti i stil’ kommunikatsii: Sopostavlenie angliiskikh i russkikh lingvokul’turnykh traditsii [The category of politeness and communication style: Comparison of English and Russian linguistic and cultural traditions]. Moscow.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/44568181/Longman_Dictionary_of_Language_Teaching_and_Applied_Linguistics
Muminov, S. M. (2000). Uzbek mulokot khulqining ijtimoiy-lisoniy hususiyatlari [Socio-linguistic features of Uzbek communication behavior] (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Tashkent.
Podgornyi, D. S. (2016). Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanii, (11–4), 756–759.
Rasulov, R. (2024). Umumiy tilshunoslik [General linguistics]. Tashkent.
Rudneva, E. A. (2016). Antropologicheskii forum, (30), 215–242.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Srisuruk, P. (2011). Politeness and pragmatic competence in Thai speakers of English (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/153776759.pdf
Turdiyeva, H. K. (2020). Nutqiy etiket birliklarining lingvopragmatik tadqiqi (fors va o’zbek tillaridagi materiallar asosida) [Linguopragmatic study of speech etiquette units (based on Persian and Uzbek languages)] (Candidate’s dissertation). Tashkent.
Uzbek tilining izohli lugati. (2022). Explanatory dictionary of the Uzbek language (Vol. 6). Tashkent: Publishing house named after Gafur Gulyam.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://assets.cambridge.org/97805217/90857/sample/9780521790857ws.pdf
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).