COMPREHENSION OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC COMPETENCES AND INSTRUCTION OF SOCIAL LANGUAGE USAGE
Abstract
A crucial part of communicative competence required for proper language usage in social situations, sociolinguistic competence is thoroughly examined in this review study. The article outlines the fundamental elements of sociolinguistic competence, including linguistic indicators of social relations, politeness norms, register differences, and awareness of dialect and accent, drawing on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and current empirical research. It highlights important obstacles to acquiring this competency, including curriculum that place more emphasis on grammatical correctness than social language proficiency and a lack of opportunity for genuine engagement. The review examines a range of research approaches used in the field, including surveys, performance-based evaluations, and experimental designs, and it provides data from studies showing that specific educational interventions can significantly improve students' sociolinguistic skills. The discussion includes effective teaching techniques, such as using authentic materials, fostering engagement with native speakers, and offering teacher training. The article's conclusion emphasizes the importance of incorporating sociolinguistic competency into language instruction to equip students for effective communication in diverse social contexts. It also urges more study to improve teaching and evaluation methods in this field.
Full text article
References
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31260438_Theoretical_Bases_of_Communicative_Approaches_to_Second_Language_Teaching_and_Testing
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35. https://openidea.uz/index.php/idea/article/view/1920
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin Books.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286558594_Pragmatic_development_in_a_second_language
Koay, J. (2021, August 26). What is sociolinguistic competence? Edu Maxi. https://www.edumaxi.com/blog/what-is-sociolinguistic-competence
Martinez, J. L., & De Vera, P. V. (2019). Sociolinguistic competence of foreign national college students. Asian EFL Journal, 21(2.5), 291–336. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED604155.pdf
Mede, E., & Dikilitaş, K. (2015). Teaching and learning sociolinguistic competence: Teachers' critical perceptions. Participatory Educational Research, 2(3), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.15.29.2.3
Nordquist, R. (2023, April 5). Sociolinguistics: Definition and examples. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/sociolinguistics-definition-1692110
Pérez-Ferra, M., Quijano-López, R., Neira-Piñeiro, M. del R., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Sociolinguistic competence and training needs of future primary education teachers. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa, 116–130. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2022.v6i2
Rehner, K., Mougeon, R., & Nadasdi, T. (2023). Developing second language learners’ sociolinguistic competence: How teachers’ linguistically informed interventions can make a difference. Canadian Modern Language Review, 79(2), 101–123.
Ritchie, M. (2011). Developing sociolinguistic competence through intercultural online exchange. In S. Thouësny & L. Bradley (Eds.), Second language teaching and learning with technology: Views of emergent researchers (pp. 123–141). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2011.9781908416001
Taguchi, N. (2008). The role of learning environment in the development of pragmatic comprehension: A comparison of gains between ESL and EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 423–452. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231944278_The_role_of_learning_context_in_the_development_of_pragmatic_comprehension_A_comparison_of_gains_between_ESL_and_EFL_learners
Taguchi, N. (2015). Developing interactional competence in a Japanese study abroad context (1st ed., pp. 1–212). Multilingual Matters Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278242962
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279698077_Artifacts_and_cultures-of-use_in_intercultural_communication_Electronic_version
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).