SEMANTIC-STYLISTIC AND ACTUAL INTERFERENCE IN THE SPEECH OF UZBEK SPEAKERS IN THE PROCESS OF USING ENGLISH ACADEMIC VOCABULARY
Abstract
This article investigates semantic-stylistic and actual cases of interference in the English academic vocabulary of Uzbek speakers. In the context of higher educational standards and increasing demand for academic English proficiency, interference remains a significant factor that influences the quality of bilingual academic communication. Analyzing interlanguage theory and cross-linguistic influence models, the research investigates how Uzbek linguistic structures affect lexical, stylistic, and semantic choices in English academic writing. The study includes a qualitative corpus-based approach, including lexical-semantic, discourse, and error analysis of around 50 academic texts produced by Uzbek EFL learners. The findings reveal that interference operates at multiple levels, such as: lexical transfer (e.g., direct translation of collocations), semantic mismatch (conceptual reinterpretation of academic terms), stylistic deviation (informal and redundant structures), and discourse-level organization issues. It is demonstrated that Uzbek learners frequently rely on native language patterns such as “make research” or “open the topic,” which is considered a deviation from English academic norms. The study highlights that interference is a systematic feature of interlanguage development rather than random error. The results point the need for explicit instruction in academic collocations, register awareness, and discourse organization in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) teaching contexts.
Full text article
References
Bekhbudy, Sh., & Rogoznaya, N. N. (2025). Phonological and semantic interference in interlanguage perspective. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, (6), 45–58.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5(4), 161–170.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Dzhusupov, M. (1991). Zvukovye sistemy russkogo i kazakhskogo yazykov. Slog. Interferentsiya. Obuchenie proiznosheniyu [Sound systems of the Russian and Kazakh languages. Syllable. Interference. Teaching pronunciation]. Fan.
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Addison Wesley Longman.
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (Eds.). (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436–486). Blackwell.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1–4), 209–231.
Semchinsky, S. V. (1973). Semanticheskaya interferentsiya yazykov (na materiale slavyano-vostochnoromanskikh yazykovykh kontaktov) [Semantic interference of languages (based on Slavic-East Romance language contacts)]. Vishcha Shkola; Izd-vo Kiev. un-ta.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students. University of Michigan Press.
Zhanpeisova, G. (2024). Linguistic bases of interference in bilingual contexts. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, 28(4), 112–125.
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).