SYNERGY OF FICTIONAL TEXT
Abstract
The article is concerned with the problem of a literary text, its specific features, and its interpretational potential viewed from the perspectives оf Prgamainguistics and Cognitive Semantics. The aim of the research is to consider the main properties specifying the fictional text as a unique synergetic wholeness and to substantiate the necessity of an interdisciplinary synergetic approach to its analysis and interpretation. Specific properties of the literary text are a) an aesthetic function in its relation to the communicative, cognitive and cultural functions; b) the principle of anthropocentrism highlighting the notions of linguistic personality of the author, personage and reader; c) the communicative character of the literary text including the process of text construction and perception; d) the interaction between textual categories of intentionality, subjective modality, imagery, implicitness, evaluation, etc.; e) the cognitive and cultural nature of the literary text considered from the perspective of cognitive principles of presenting information in the text: distribution of given and new information, the principle of foregrounding, the principle of binary oppositions and contrast in the literary text. The result of the undertaken research consists in the following conclusion: the synergy of a literary text is conditioned by a) the synergetics of a literary text is conditioned by: a) the multidimensional structure of fictional text that includes structural-semantic, stylistic, communicative-pragmatic, cognitive and cultural dimensions; b) the interaction of textual categories such as intentionality, subjective-evaluative modality, linguistic creativity, implicitness, imagery, evaluativeness, emotiveness; c) a hierarchically organized system of relations and textual associations built on the basis of the principles of binary opposition and contrast; d) a variety of communicative, stylistic, pragmatic, cognitive and cultural functions, united by a single function of aesthetic impact; e) the anthropocentric character of a literary text reflected in the linguistic personality of the author, character and reader, each of them having their own linguistic markers on the surface layer of the text; f) some common theoretical assumptions and methodological principles of Text Stylistics and Interpretation, Pragmalinguistics, Cognitive Linguistics and that ensures the extrapolation of some methods of Pragmalinguistics and Cognitive Linguistics into the field of Text Stylistics and Interpretation.
Full text article
References
1. Anan'ina M.A. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta: Ser. Filologicheskie nauki, 2012, No 3, pp .45–47.
2. Arnol'd I.V. Stilistika sovremennogo angliiskogo yazyka: Stilistika dekodirovaniya: 3-e izd. (Stylistics of modern English: Decoding stylistics. 3 rd ed.), Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1990, 300 p.
3. Bairamova L.K. Aksiologicheskii frazeologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka: slovar' tsennostei i antitsennostei (Axiological dictionary of phraseological units of the Russian language: Dictionary of values and antivalues), Kazan': Tsentr inovatsionnykh tekhnologii, 2011, 360 p.
4. Bairamova L.K. Schast'e i neschast'e kak tsennost' i antitsennost' vo frazeologicheskoi paradigme (Happiness and unhappiness as value and antivalue in phraseological paradigm), Kazan': Tsentr innovatsionnykh tekhnologii, 2011, 276 p.
5. Vinokur G.O. O yazyke khudozhestvennoi literatury (On the language of a fictional literature), Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1991, 448 p.
6. Galieva M.R. Kognitivnaya lingvistika, Tambov, 2014, No 2, pp. 56– 65.
7. Galieva M.R. Teolingvistika: istoki, napravleniya, perspektivy (Theolinguistics: the origins, directions, perspectives), Tashkent: Vneshinvestprom, 2018, 260 p.
8. Gal'perin I.R. Tekst kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya (Text as a subject of linguistic research), Moscow: URSS, Lenand, 2017, 144 p.
9. Dzhusupov N.M. Kognitivnaya stilistika. Teoriya i praktika strategii vydvizheniya v khudozhestvennom tekste (Cognitive Stylistics. Theory and practice of foregrounding strategy in the literary text), Tashkent: Vneshinvestprom, 2019, 463 p.
10. Zykova I.V. Metayazyk lingvokul'turologii: Konstanty i varianty, 2017, pp. 542–667.
11. Zykova I.V. Yazyk. Soznanie. Kommunikatsiya, ussue 53, 2016, pp. 136–151.
12. Zykova I.V., Kiose M.I. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, 2020, No 2, pp. 26–40.
13. Iriskhanova O.K. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, Moscow, 2009, pp. 157–171.
14. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsept, diskurs (Language circle: personality, concept, discourse), Moscow: Gnozis, 2004, 390 p.
15. Karaulov Yu.N. Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost' (Russian language and Russian personality), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 261 p.
16. Kiose M.I. Yazyk, kul'tura, tvorchestvo, Moscow: Gnozis, 2020, pp. 113–129.
17. Kiose M.I. Ural'skii filologicheskii vestnik. Ser. Yazyk. Sistema. Lichnost': Lingvistika kreativa, 2020, ussue 29, No 2, pp. 37–47. DOI 10.26170/ufv20-02-03
18. Kiose M.I. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, 2019, No 4, pp. 66–76.
19. Kratkii slovar' kognitivnykh terminov (Short dictionary of cognitive terms), Moscow: Filologicheskii fakul'tet MGU, 1996, 245 p.
20. Kubryakova E.S. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoi lingvistiki, Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2007, pp. 46–59.
21. Kuleshova A. V. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2014, No 2, pp. 4–7.
22. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya (Structural anthropology), Moscow: Nauka, 1983, 535 p.
23. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. Kul'tura i vzryv sredi myslyashchikh mirov. Stat'i. Issledovaniya. Zametki (Semiosphere: Culture and Explosion. Inside the thinking worlds: Articles. Research. Notes), Sankt-Peterburg: IskusstvoSPB, 2001, 704 p.
24. Malakhova N.V. Kategoriya kontrasta v khudozhestvennom tekste (Category of contrast in the literary text), available at: https://interactiveplus.ru/ru/action/276/diary_conf
25. Martynova O. P. Kontrast kak semantiko-funktsional'naya osnova khudozhestvennogo teksta (na primere teksta angloyazychnogo korotkogo rasskaza) (Contrast as a semantic-functional basis of the literary text (on the example of English short stories): Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis, Moscow: 2006, 17 p.
26. Normurodova N.Z. Antropotsentrizm khudozhestvennogo teksta (Anthropocentricity of the literary text), Tashkent, 2020, 240 p.
27. Sossyur F. de. Trudy po yazykoznaniyu (Selected writings in Linguistics), Moscow: Progress, 1977, 695 p.
28. Trubetskoi N. S. Osnovy fonologii (Principles of Phonology), Moscow: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1960, 372 p.
29. Frumkina R. M. Informatsionnye protsessy i sistemy, 1992, No 3, pp. 1–7.
30. Enkvist N.E. Parametry konteksta (Context parameters), Moscow: Progress, 1980, pp. 254–270.
31. Yakobson R. Ya. Raboty po poetike (Works in poetics), Moscow: Progress, 1987, 464 p.
32. Yakobson R., Fant G. M. i Khalle M. Novoe v lingvistike, 1962, ussue 2, pp. 173–230.
33. Carter Ronald. Language and Creativity. The Art of Common Talk. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2016, 288 p.
34. Fillmore Charles. Quaderni di Semantica, 1985, Vol 6, No 2, pp 222– 254. (in Russ).
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International License
(CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © by author(s).