METHODOLOGICAL AND ANALYTICAL APPROACHES TO RESEARCH METHODS IN CONTEMPORARY FORENSIC LINGUISTICS STUDIES

Ashurov B(1)
(1) Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Abstract

The present article examines methodological and analytical approaches employed in contemporary forensic linguistics studies. The research focuses on one of the key issues of modern forensic linguistics, namely the selection of reliable research methods for analyzing language as legal evidence. The relevance of the study is determined by the increasing importance of linguistic expertise in legal practice, where methodological accuracy directly influences the validity of expert conclusions. The purpose of the article is to systematize and evaluate the main methodological frameworks used in forensic linguistics, with emphasis on their theoretical foundations and practical applicability. Particular attention is paid to the interaction between traditional qualitative methods, such as discourse analysis, stylistic analysis, and pragmatic interpretation, and quantitative approaches based on corpus linguistics and computational techniques. The novelty of the research lies in its integrative perspective, which considers forensic linguistics as an interdisciplinary field combining linguistic, legal, and analytical dimensions. This approach makes it possible to identify current methodological trends, including the growing use of hybrid research models. The findings demonstrate that contemporary forensic linguistics increasingly relies on the combination of interpretative and empirical methods, enhancing the evidential value and reliability of linguistic analysis. At the same time, methodological challenges related to standardization, expert competence, and the analysis of digital communication are highlighted. The article concludes that the further development of coherent and methodologically grounded analytical frameworks is essential for strengthening the scientific and practical foundations of forensic linguistics within modern legal systems.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Bazylev, V. N. (2022). Metodologicheskie problemy pri issledovanii produktov rechevoj dejatel'nosti v sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertize. (Methodological problems in the study of speech products in forensic linguistic examination). Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya, 3(1 (69)), 6–14. https://sciup.org/14126371

Batyushkina, M. V. (2016). Lingvisticheskaya i pravovaya modeli klassifikatsii lingvisticheskikh ekspertiz. (Linguistic and legal models for the classification of linguistic examinations). Politicheskaya lingvistika, 6(1), 222–230. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvisticheskaya-i-pravovaya-modeli-klassifikatsii-lingvisticheskih-ekspertiz/pdf

Brinev, K. I. (2021). Osnovnye metodologicheskie problemy sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertizy: svyaz' teoreticheskikh i prikladnykh issledovanij. (Main methodological problems of forensic linguistic examination: The connection between theoretical and applied research). In Yazyk, pravo, obshchestvo: sbornik nauchnykh statej IV Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii, 6(1), 110–113. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/44891290

Galyashina, E. I. (2003). Metodologicheskie osnovy sudebnogo rechevedeniya (Methodological foundations of forensic speech studies) [Doktorskaya dissertatsiya, Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet imeni M. V. Lomonosova]. 23. Retrieved from https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/906294213.pdf

Ivanov, P. K. (2021). Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza: struktura dokumenta i kompetentsii lingvista-eksperta. (Linguistic expertise: Structure of the document and competencies of the forensic linguist). Yuridicheskaya lingvistika, 5(1), 10–24. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvisticheskaya-ekspertiza-struktura-dokumenta-i-kompetentsii-lingvista-eksperta/pdf

Kuznetsov, V. O. (2022). Metody sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertizy. (Methods of forensic linguistic examination). Teoriya i praktika sudebnoj ekspertizy, 17(4), 6–17. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368349324

Kusov, G. V. (2011). Obshchie i chastnye zadachi metodologii sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertizy. (General and specific tasks of the methodology of forensic linguistic examination). Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 4 (7), 95–102. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obschie-i-chastnye-zadachi-metodologii-sudebnoy-lingvisticheskoy-ekspertizy-1

Nadeina, T. M., & Chubina, E. A. (2019). Forensic linguistics and judicial speech studies: Correlation of objects and subject areas. (Forensic linguistics and judicial speech studies: Correlation of objects and subject areas). Philology. Theory & Practice, 12(4), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.4.55

Smirnov, A. V. (2020). Sovremennaya teoreticheskaya lingvistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza. (Modern theoretical linguistics and forensic examination). Higher School of Economics Publications, 1–30. Retrieved from https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/367592891.pdf

Al-Amr, M. M., & Atwell, E. (2020). Forensic linguistic analysis using computational methods, Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON), Vol. 1, Issue 1, – P. 291–300. Retrieved from https://aclanthology.org/2020.icon-main.34.pdf. (In Eng.)

Ariani M. G., Sajedi F., Sajedi M. (2014). Forensic linguistics: A brief overview of the key elements. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 158. — P. 222–225. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814061710/pdf (In Eng.)

Coulthard, M. (2017). Forensic linguistics, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, Vol. 24, Issue 1, — P. 1–15. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40764680 (In Eng.)

Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence, Routledge, — P. 1–250. Retrieved from https://pasca.uns.ac.id/s3linguistik/wp-content/uploads/sites/44/2016/10/Malcolm_Coulthard__Alison_Johnson.pdf. (In Eng.)

Durant, A., & Leung, J. H. C. (2016). Techniques in forensic linguistics, Language and Law: A Resource Book for Students, Chapter B9, — P. 96–100. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315436258-21. (In Eng.)

Fobbe, E. (2020). Text-linguistic analysis in forensic authorship attribution, International Journal of Language & Law (JLL), 9. – P. 93–114. https://doi.org/10.14762/jll.2020.093 (In Eng.)

Helmi, R., Maulina, S., & Mardhatillah, F. (2025). Forensic linguistics in legal contexts: Examining plagiarism, legal documents, and defamation, British World Multilingual Studies. Beyond Words, Vol. 13, Issue 1, – P. 27–41. Retrieved from https://journal.ukwms.ac.id/index.php/BW/article/view/7378 (In Eng.)

Heydon, G. (2019). Researching forensic linguistics: Approaches and applications, Routledge, — P. 1–256 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290640. (In Eng.)

Ismoilov, K. (2025). Forensic linguistics: Analysis of modern approaches, Oriental Journal of Philology, Vol. 5, Issue 07, — P. 173–183. Retrieved from https://supportscience.uz/index.php/ojp/article/view/3302. (In Eng.)

Kusumawardhani, P. (2024). Forensic linguistics and legal language analysis, Journal of Linguistic Research, Vol. 10, Issue 2, — P. 45–60. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c3b0/611328cd8ae8d8041b3b2ac92f5789236981.pdf. (In Eng.)

Kusumawardhani, P. (2024). Language and forensic linguistics, International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, Issue 1, — P. 48–53. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c3b0/611328cd8ae8d8041b3b2ac92f5789236981.pdf. (In Eng.)

Mani, R. T., Palimar, V., Pai, M. S., Shwetha, T. S., & Krishnan, M. N. (2025). An evolution of forensic linguistics: From manual analysis to machine learning — A narrative review, Forensic Science International: Reports, Vol. 11, — P. 100417 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100417. (In Eng.)

Nini, A. (2015). Authorship attribution in forensic linguistics, Aston University, PhD Thesis, – P. 1–260. Retrieved from https://research.aston.ac.uk/files/16328744/Nini_Andrea_2015.pdf (In Eng.)

Nowak, P. (2021). Legal and forensic linguistic methods, Comparative Legilinguistics, Vol. 45, Issue 1, – P. 1–15. Retrieved from https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cl/article/download/25205/26475/64341. (In Eng.)

Ntelu A., Musa D. T., & Muassomah M. (2025). The role of forensic linguistics in investigating and uncovering language crimes on social media. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, — P. 283-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1501.31. (In Eng.)

Sharipov, S. B. (2025). Sovet va zamonaviy o‘zbek tilshunosligida metodologiya muammosi, Modern Science and Research, Vol. 3, Issue 2, — P. 112–119 Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/download/27908/28733. (In Uzb.)

Solan, L. M. (2013). Language and law: The linguistic foundations of legal interpretation, Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 71, Issue 1, — P. 1–36. Retrieved from https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=jlp. (In Eng.)

Thamer, A. A. (2025). Forensic linguistic analysis of authorship identification of selected anonymous comments on ‘Gaza attack’ in Threads social media application, Journal of Education College Wasit University, 58(1). — P. 501-512. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol58.Iss1.4186 (In Eng.)

To‘rayeva, D. A. (2024). Shaxsiy yozishmalar lingvistik ekspertizasida metodologiya masalasi, Zenodo Conference Papers, Vol. 1, Issue 1, – P. 427–433. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11110814. (In Uzb.)

Wasi, M., Zaki, S., & Anwar, R. H. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of research in forensic linguistics, SAGE Open, Vol. 14, Issue 4, — P. 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241299280. (In Eng.)

Wright, D. (2021) Corpus approaches to forensic linguistics. In M. Coulthard, A. May and R. Sousa-Silva (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (2nd edn). London: Routledge. — P. 611–627. Retrieved from https://david-wright.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/wright-2021-post-print.pdf (In Eng.)

Базылев, В. Н. (2022). Методологические проблемы при исследовании продуктов речевой деятельности в судебной лингвистической экспертизе, Вестник Академии права и управления, Vol. 3, Issue 1 (69), – P. 6–14. Retrieved from https://sciup.org/14126371. (In Rus.)

Батюшкина, М. В. (2016). Лингвистическая и правовая модели классификации лингвистических экспертиз, Политическая лингвистика, Vol. 6, Issue 1, — С. 222–230. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvisticheskaya-i-pravovaya-modeli-klassifikatsii-lingvisticheskih-ekspertiz/pdf. (In Rus.)

Бринев, К. И. (2021). Основные методологические проблемы судебной лингвистической экспертизы: связь теоретических и прикладных исследований, Язык, право, общество: сборник научных статей IV Международной научно-практической конференции, Vol. 6, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.4.55. С. 110–113. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/44891290/Основные_методологические_проблемы_судебной_лингвистической_экспертизы_связь_теоретических_и_прикладных_исследований. (In Rus.)

Галяшина, Е. И. (2003). Методологические основы судебного речеведения [Doctoral dissertation, Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова]. — C. 23. Retrieved from https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/906294213.pdf. (In Rus.)

Иванов, П. К. (2021). Лингвистическая экспертиза: структура документа и компетенции лингвиста-эксперта, Юридическая лингвистика, Vol. 5, Issue 1, — С. 10–24. Retrieved fromhttps://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvisticheskaya-ekspertiza-struktura-dokumenta-i-kompetentsii-lingvista-eksperta/pdf. (In Rus.)

Кузнецов В. О. (2022). Методы судебной лингвистической экспертизы (Methods of Forensic Linguistics), Теория и практика судебной экспертизы, 17(4). — C. 6–17. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368349324_Methods_of_Forensic_Linguistics (In Rus.)

Кусов, Г. В. (2011). Общие и частные задачи методологии судебной лингвистической экспертизы, Теория и практика общественного развития, Vol. 4, Issue 7, — C. 95–102. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obschie-i-chastnye-zadachi-metodologii-sudebnoy-lingvisticheskoy-ekspertizy-1. (In Rus.)

Надеина, Т. М., & Чубина, Е. А. (2019). Forensic linguistics and judicial speech studies: Correlation of objects and subject areas, Philology Theory & Practice, Vol. 12, Issue 4, — P. 263–269 https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.4.55. (In Rus.)

Смирнов, А. В. (2020). Современная теоретическая лингвистика и судебная экспертиза, Higher School of Economics Publications, – С. 1–30. Retrieved from https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/367592891.pdf. (In Rus.)

Authors

Ashurov B
bashurov055@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Ashurov B

Independent researcher

METHODOLOGICAL AND ANALYTICAL APPROACHES TO RESEARCH METHODS IN CONTEMPORARY FORENSIC LINGUISTICS STUDIES. (2026). Foreign Languages ​​in Uzbekistan (FLEDU.UZ), 66(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.36078/1767726132

Article Details

How to Cite

METHODOLOGICAL AND ANALYTICAL APPROACHES TO RESEARCH METHODS IN CONTEMPORARY FORENSIC LINGUISTICS STUDIES. (2026). Foreign Languages ​​in Uzbekistan (FLEDU.UZ), 66(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.36078/1767726132