COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SEMANTIC FEATURES OF GENDER LEXIS IN ENGLISH, RUSSIAN, AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Chutpulatov Mukhammad(1)
(1) Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Abstract

Gender dimorphism that exists in human real life is usually viewed through the prism of gender stereotypes of femininity (femininity) and masculinity (masculinity). At the same time, the totality of qualities belonging to each gender — male and female and other prototypes in the public and individual consciousness — is revealed. At the same time, the totality of qualities belonging to each gender — male and female and other prototypes in the public and individual consciousness — is revealed. Therefore, despite several works, there are many unresolved problems in the nature of the term, and their study and solution certainly require access to information about modern linguistic trends. The purpose of this research is to study the semantic features of gender vocabulary in English, Russian and Uzbek languages in a linguistically contrastive way. To highlight the topic of the article, linguistic description and the comparative-contrast methods were used. A comparative study of the gender vocabulary of English, Russian and Uzbek languages was carried out and it was substantiated that the features associated with the democratization of gender speech occur due to the approach of women's speech to men's speech while maintaining its natural gender foundations, and that the scale and characteristics of this gender speech democratization are different in the languages being compared. Monolingual and comparative analysis of the use of gender vocabulary in the material of works of art in the languages being studied is not only linguistic, but also extralinguistic in nature, that is, features of the historical development of national culture, traditions, national mentality and national culture. society from the point of view of religious, speech and behavioral views of men and women, the features of such factors have been proven

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Apresyan Yu.D. Idei i metody sovremennoi strukturnoi lingvistiki (Ideas and methods of modern structural linguistics). Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1966. 345 p.

Bagana Zh., Khapilina E.V. Nauchnye vedomosti. Ser. gumanitarnye nauki, 2016, no. 21 (242), issue 31, pp. 31–35.

Baker P.S. Pronouns. The Electronic Introduction to Old English. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.

Bliznyuk O.V. Sopostavitel'nyi semanticheskii analiz terminov rodstva v razlichnykh lingvokul'turakh (Comparative semantic analysis of kinship terms in different linguacultures). Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Tver', 2006. 24 p.

Burukina O.A. Yazyk. Soznanie. Kommunikatsiya, vol. 14. Moscow, 2000, pp. 84–88.

Butinov Kh.A. Sovetskaya Etnografiya. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, no. 3, pp. 65–75.

Dasheeva V.V. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pedagogika. Filologiya. Filosofiya, Ulan-Ude, 2015, no. 8, pp. 55–59.

Demchenko E.V. Semantiko-sintaksicheskie sredstva vyrazheniya kategorii vezhlivosti v angliiskom i russkom yazykakh. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Rostov-na-Donu, 2007. 24 p.

Enikeeva D. Brak pod mikroskopom (Marriage under the microscope). Moscow, 2006. 697 p.

Ergasheva G. Ingliz va o’zbek tillari frazeologizm paremijalarida gender aspektining qijosij-tipologik tadqiqi. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Tashkent, 2011.

Etymology Online. Available at: https://www.etymonline.com/word/human (accessed 19 April 2018).

Fedorchuk E.V. Mezh"yazykovaya omonimiya i paronimiya v blizkorodstvennykh yazykakh. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow, 2001. 255 p.

Gak V.G. Printsipy i metody semanticheskikh issledovanii. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, pp. 73–92.

Golev N.D. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 2013, no. 6 (26), pp. 14–27.

Goroshko E.I. Vvedenie v gendernye issledovaniya. Kharkov: KhTsGI; Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2001, part 1, pp. 508–542.

Gritsenko E.S. Gender: yazyk, kul'tura, kommunikatsiya. Moscow: MGLU, 2001, pp. 13–14.

Gvozdeva A.A. Yazykovaya kartina mira: lingvokul'turologicheskie i tendernye osobennosti. Candidate’s thesis. Tambov, 2003. 151 p.

Hilloowala Y. Women’s role in politics in the medieval Muslim world. March 7, 2015. Available at: http://www.medievalists.net/2015/03/womens-role-politics-medievalmuslim-world/ (accessed 3 April 2018).

Kalinina O.N. Molodoi uchenyi, 2016, no. 11 (115), pp. 1698–1700.

Kapanadze L.A. Razvitie leksiki sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Moscow: Nauka, 1965, pp. 75–85.

Kazakova A.V. Vestnik Shadrinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta, 2016, no. 4, pp. 112–116.

Kazantsev A.Yu. Terminy rodstva i svoistva v eniseiskikh yazykakh. Candidate’s thesis. Tomsk, 2004. 167 p.

Kirilina A.V. Filologicheskie nauki, 1998, no. 2, pp. 51–58.

Kirilina A.V. Gendernye aspekty yazyka i kommunikatsii. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Moscow, 2000. 40 p.

Kirillova O.V. Slavyanskie yazyki i kul'tura. Proceedings of the International Conference. Tula, 2007.

Kryukov M.V. Onomastika Vostoka. Moscow: Nauka, 1980, pp. 165–169.

Laskova M.V. Grammaticheskaya kategoriya roda v aspekte gendernoi lingvistiki. Candidate’s thesis. Krasnodar, 2001. 301 p.

Lisitsyna V.O., Arutyunov E.K. Istoricheskaya i sotsial'noobrazovatel'naya mysl', 2013, no. 6 (22), pp. 180–183.

Nikol'skaya V.A. Gender: yazyk, kul'tura, kommunikatsiya. Moscow: MGLU, 2002, pp. 64–66.

Online Etymology Dictionary. Available at: https://www.etymonline.com/word/queen

Potapov V.V. Izvestiya AN. Seriya literatury i yazyka, 1997, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 53–62.

Semenova M. Lebedinaya doroga (Swan Road). Moscow: AST, 1999. 559 p.

Skachkova I.I. Vestnik TGEU, 2009, no. 4, pp. 129–130.

Strausov V.N. Universitetskie chteniya. Pyatigorsk, 2009, part 3, pp. 49–56.

Trubachev O.N. Istoriya slavyanskikh terminov rodstva i nekotorykh drevneishikh terminov obshchestvennogo stroya. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, 1959. 212 p.

Tukhtasinov I.M. Lingvokul'turologicheskie i gendernye osobennosti slozhnykh slov v khudozhestvennom tekste. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Tashkent, 2011. 37 p.

Tsyganenko G.P. Etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka. 1989. 511 p.

Vandysheva A.V. Genderno orientirovannaya leksika v yazykovoi kartine mira. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Rostov-on-Don, 2007. 25 p.

Warner K. Isabella of France: The Rebel Queen. Paris: Amberley Publishing, 2016. ISBN 9781445647401.

http://kommersant.uz/uz/intervyu-uz/rasulova-biznes-va-oila

http://kommersant.uz/uz/yangiliklar/gender–kreditlash–biznesdagi–ayollar–a–idagi–stereotiplarni–uzgartirib–buladimi

http://www.ziyouz.uz/ru/proza/uzbekskaya-dramaturgiya/725-2012-09-08-04-15-32

https://zen.yandex.ru/media/booksforyou/poliglot–dmitrii–petrov–5–iarkih–iazykovyh–tendencii–kotorye–stremitelno–meniaiut–mir––5ab68d5aad0f22c18e31d5c9

Authors

Chutpulatov Mukhammad
info@fledu.uz (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Chutpulatov Mukhammad

Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs
Doctor of Philosophy in Philological Sciences (PhD)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SEMANTIC FEATURES OF GENDER LEXIS IN ENGLISH, RUSSIAN, AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. (2024). Foreign Languages ​​in Uzbekistan (JOURNALFLEDU.COM), 59(6), 140-162. https://doi.org/10.36078/1735412162

Article Details

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SEMANTIC FEATURES OF GENDER LEXIS IN ENGLISH, RUSSIAN, AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. (2024). Foreign Languages ​​in Uzbekistan (JOURNALFLEDU.COM), 59(6), 140-162. https://doi.org/10.36078/1735412162